Friday, 23 March 2012
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
Edit Process
The major issue we've come across when coming to edit is the fact that the interviewees seemed pretty concerned in promoting their own cause, in other words, almost nothing they say relates to what the other says. As far as learning curves go, this is a steep one. In order to get around this we have had to sacrifice much of what we initially thought good footage in order to create a loose structure that gets an audience from A to B.
Multi Camera; Due to the fact we had two DSLR's to use on the project we thought it a good idea to have two camera set ups per interview in order to achieve a more interesting style and break up information that could have otherwise been quite mundane and relentless. The problem with this is that in post we discovered that the two cameras were potentially set up slightly differently, meaning that the two angles differed in colouring. We used filters and colour correction to get around this and generally I'm pleased with the result. Paul in particular when using the stationary footage, was badly washed out and not vibrant at all, the finished result, while clearly altered, does a good job of establishing continuity.
The End; I have a big issue with the ending, I found it really hard to end the documentary in anyway better than the way we did. With the footage we captured it seemed that no matter what we finished with it was always a bit of an anti climax and didn't really leave the audience with any lasting message. I'm aware that this is a big issue as the ending of this kind of documentary should be a summary of the film as a whole. If i were to do this project again i would be more aware of the edit during the shooting process and try to get what i needed out of the interviewees, rather than settling for just anything.
Screen Grabs;
As you can see from these screen grabs we chose to colour correct some of the footage to improve continuity.
The major issue we've come across when coming to edit is the fact that the interviewees seemed pretty concerned in promoting their own cause, in other words, almost nothing they say relates to what the other says. As far as learning curves go, this is a steep one. In order to get around this we have had to sacrifice much of what we initially thought good footage in order to create a loose structure that gets an audience from A to B.
Multi Camera; Due to the fact we had two DSLR's to use on the project we thought it a good idea to have two camera set ups per interview in order to achieve a more interesting style and break up information that could have otherwise been quite mundane and relentless. The problem with this is that in post we discovered that the two cameras were potentially set up slightly differently, meaning that the two angles differed in colouring. We used filters and colour correction to get around this and generally I'm pleased with the result. Paul in particular when using the stationary footage, was badly washed out and not vibrant at all, the finished result, while clearly altered, does a good job of establishing continuity.
The End; I have a big issue with the ending, I found it really hard to end the documentary in anyway better than the way we did. With the footage we captured it seemed that no matter what we finished with it was always a bit of an anti climax and didn't really leave the audience with any lasting message. I'm aware that this is a big issue as the ending of this kind of documentary should be a summary of the film as a whole. If i were to do this project again i would be more aware of the edit during the shooting process and try to get what i needed out of the interviewees, rather than settling for just anything.
Screen Grabs;
As you can see from these screen grabs we chose to colour correct some of the footage to improve continuity.
Documentary Audio
The documentary opens with a live mix by James Rand, as shown, he uses a number of analog mixers along side the software Ableton to produce the track on the spot. As a result, we have no MP3 or WAV file, just the sync sound we captured on both the Marantz 660 and Canon DSLR's
The second track we used is one produced by Dauwd, a producer from Liverpool who has been kind enough to give us a free range of his tracks.
The documentary opens with a live mix by James Rand, as shown, he uses a number of analog mixers along side the software Ableton to produce the track on the spot. As a result, we have no MP3 or WAV file, just the sync sound we captured on both the Marantz 660 and Canon DSLR's
The second track we used is one produced by Dauwd, a producer from Liverpool who has been kind enough to give us a free range of his tracks.
Locations
While in Liverpool we intend to visit two particular establishments. The first is 'The shipping forecast,' the reason behind going to this bar is that two of the three intended interviewees have ties with it. Andy Hill is a promoter who often uses this bar as the venue for his nights and James Rand is a producer/DJ who has a residency here, along with one another club.
As you can see from this screen shot, at the time this was taken The Shipping Forecast was yet to exist however the building is clearly recognisable as the legitimate establishment from the documentary.
Similar to the above, the venue shown in the film has yet to be arrive on Google Maps...
While in Liverpool we intend to visit two particular establishments. The first is 'The shipping forecast,' the reason behind going to this bar is that two of the three intended interviewees have ties with it. Andy Hill is a promoter who often uses this bar as the venue for his nights and James Rand is a producer/DJ who has a residency here, along with one another club.
Similar to the above, the venue shown in the film has yet to be arrive on Google Maps...
Shot List
Shot | Location | Shot Type | INT/EXT | Movement | Interviewee | Equipment |
1 | James Rand's Room | Medium Shot | Interior | Static | James Rand | Camera/Tripod |
2 | James Rand's Room | CU | Interior | Static | James Rand | Camera/Tripod |
3 | James Rand's Room | CU OTS | Interior | Static | James Rand | Camera/Tripod |
4 | James Rand's Room | CU of mixing equipment | Interior | Static | James Rand | Camera/Tripod |
5 | James Rand's Room | High angle | Interior | Static | James Rand | Camera |
6 | James Rand's Room | Medium OTS | Interior | Static | James Rand | Camera/Tripod |
7 | Peacocks Bar | Medium Shot | Interior | Static | Paul | Camera/Tripod |
8 | Peacocks Bar | CU of face | Interior | Static/Free hand | Paul | Camera |
9 | Peacocks Bar | Medium Long Shot of Peacocks Sign | Exterior | Static | Paul | Camera/Tripod |
10 | Peacocks Bar | Medium Shot of statue | Exterior | Static | Paul | Camera/Tripod |
11 | Peacocks Bar | Medium Shot | Interior | Static/Free hand | Paul | Camera |
12 | The Shipping Forecast | Medium Shot | Exterior | Static | Andy | Camera/Tripod |
13 | The Shipping Forecast | CU of face | Exterior | Static/Free Hand | Andy | Camera |
14 | Streets of Liverpool | Medium | Exterior | Static | n/a | Camera/Tripod |
15 | Streets of Liverpool | Long Shot (Building) | Exterior | Static | n/a | Camera/Tripod |
16 | Streets of Liverpool | CU (Simon Cowell (Graffiti) | Exterior | Static | n/a | Camera/Tripod |
17 | Streets of Liverpool | Medium Shot (Bar) | Exterior | Static | n/a | Camera/Tripod |
18 | Streets of Liverpool | Medium (Gig Posters) | Exterior | Static | n/a | Camera/Tripod |
19 | Streets of Liverpool | Long Shot (street/ posters) | Exterior | Static | n/a | Camera/Tripod |
20 | Streets of Liverpool | Push Focus (Street) | Exterior | Static | n/a | Camera/Tripod |
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)







